Mark,
This certainly does not add confidence in the "techniques no one else is
using":
```
⋮
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
host darwin.ctyme.com [184.105.182.171]
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
550-FAKE-REJECT - TLD-FROM [click] is blocked - X=darwin
⋮
```
Best regards
-lem
On 22 Sep 2017, at 8:40, Marc Perkel wrote:
This is something I'm thinking about doing - providing a service that
integrates into SA as a plug in and communicates with my servers to
return a useful score enhancer.
If there is interest my initial demo test will be just stuffing the
subject line into a IP/port and returning a number where positive is
spam and negative is ham. This would just be a proof of concept.
The next level would be sending the message headers and eventually -
the full message.
Would need someone to write a simple plugin - not a perl guy - but how
hard can that be? Would eventually need to be encrypted though.
Starting with just the subject won't return a result all the time.
Many request will return a 0 if it can't figure it out. If it does
return a result that is significantly away from 0 it's probably right.
And it is more likely to return a result from ham than spam confirming
good email as good. Obviously - using the header and then the whole
message will be more accurate.
I'm using new techniques no one else is using.
So - any interest?
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400