> > On 4/23/2010 10:49 AM, Bob Archer wrote: > > >> > > >>> Furthermore reverting the working copy does not work and updates > skip > > >>> the "folder" resource completely. > > >> > > >> You've deleted the pristine copy under .svn for that directory. > > There's > > >> no copy left to revert. > > > > > > Update is totally different than revert. If you delete the folder then > > do an UP the folder is replaced "A". However, if you create a dir then > > remove that and do an UP the folder isn't fetched. It does seem strange. > I > > assume something is going on where .svn at the root indicates that > folder > > is there. > > > > > > > It seems wrong to remove an unmanaged item, although in the special case > > of an empty directory I guess it wouldn't make much difference. > > > > -- > > Les Mikesell > > lesmikes...@gmail.com > > I agree it is wrong. But, I also think something is smarmy here. For > example, if you create the folder after deleting it with the OS command > (rather than SVN) then realize your mistake, rd the folder and do svn up > it really should get the folder from the repo assuming your depth is set > to infinity. > > If I do the same thing with a file... delete it (OS cmd), then create the > same name, svn will report it with a status of "M" and a commit will merge > the diff between that file and base. >
Also, consider that the metadata for fodler is in /test/.svn not /test/folder/.svn BOb