Andy Peters wrote on Mon, 26 Apr 2010 at 15:59 -0700: > On Apr 26, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Andy Peters wrote on Mon, 26 Apr 2010 at 11:28 -0700: > >> ... spoke too soon. svn doesn't like an empty fsfs.conf file; it > >> complains about missing section headers when trying to do an update or > >> whatever. > >> > > > > I can't reproduce this with trunk or 1.6.x. > > I suppose I should be clearer. Without fsfs.conf, the Subversion client > complained.
I do not get a complaint with an empty or non-existent fsfs.conf: % cd /tmp % svnadmin create r % svn co -q file:///tmp/r wc1 % svn up -q wc1 % rm -f r/db/fsfs.conf % svn up -q wc1 % touch r/db/fsfs.conf % svn up -q wc1 % (same output with 1.6.x and trunk)