On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:46 PM, David Darj <z...@alagazam.net> wrote: > On 2010-12-17 22:58, Mark Phippard wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:42 PM,<r...@elilabs.com> wrote: >>> >>> Any idea why TSVN 1.6.12 Build 20536 2010/11/24 claims to be using SVN >>> 1.6.15 before it was released? >> >> Subversion 1.6.15 was released several weeks ago. David is just one >> person of many that creates a binary version and he is simply >> announcing availability of his binaries. TortoiseSVN does not release >> until we have officially released the source. >> >> BTW, David is there really any reason to broadcast your release in >> these forums? CollabNet has never done that (and would not want to >> see us start). While I think the info is somewhat useful in general >> it would get ugly if everyone that produced binaries announced it on >> all the lists every time. You can announce it on sf.net and users can >> subscribe to lists or RSS feeds there if they want to be updated on >> releases. >> > I just keep up the work where DJ Heap (and Troy Simpson) left off building > and announcing these binaries. > If it's not appropiate to announce it here I will stop. > > Anyway announcment on my Win32 build of Subversion will be announced at the > sf page at https://sourceforge.net/projects/win32svn/ where a RSS feed is > also available.
*I* appreciate seeing them, but I've made some informal announcements for the RPMforge updates, especially for RHEL and CentOS users. Since I tend to pre-test and submit the .spec files for the last few releases, I may have some self-interest there.
