On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:18 AM, David Aldrich >> <david.aldr...@emea.nec.com> wrote: >> >>>> > I think there was mention on the developers list of releasing >>>> > Subversion 1.6.17. I am interested in the improvements to Windows >>>> > checkout. >>>> > >>>> >>>> Are you talking about version 1.6.17 or version 1.7.x? I haven't seen >>>> anything >>>> about 1.6.17 here on the list, but there have been a few references on >>>> 1.7.x >>>> here... >>>> >>>> The news in the upcoming 1.7.x you'll find here: >>>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html >>>> ... but no release date though >>> >>> I really did mean 1.6.17, as it is on the status page. >> >> Note that the change you are looking for has been nominated for >> backport but does not have the essential 3 votes yet. So if you have >> built the branch and seen improvements it would not hurt to start >> lobbying. You might motivate someone to review the branch and vote >> for it. >> >> See: /branches/1.6.x-issue3719 > > It currently has 2 of the 3 required votes (see > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS). I > have previously looked at the branch (and built it), but didn't have > time to review it in detail yet. I'll try to take another look tonight > so this can be backported ...
Ok, the 3rd vote is in, so the fix is all set for being backported. When 1.6.17 gets made, it should hop along ... -- Johan
