On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:18 AM, David Aldrich
>>> <david.aldr...@emea.nec.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> > I think there was mention on the developers list of releasing
>>>>> > Subversion 1.6.17.  I am interested in the improvements to Windows
>>>>> > checkout.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you talking about version 1.6.17 or version 1.7.x? I haven't seen 
>>>>> anything
>>>>> about 1.6.17 here on the list, but there have been a few references on 
>>>>> 1.7.x
>>>>> here...
>>>>>
>>>>> The news in the upcoming 1.7.x you'll find here:
>>>>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html
>>>>> ... but no release date though
>>>>
>>>> I really did mean 1.6.17, as it is on the status page.
>>>
>>> Note that the change you are looking for has been nominated for
>>> backport but does not have the essential 3 votes yet.  So if you have
>>> built the branch and seen improvements it would not hurt to start
>>> lobbying.  You might motivate someone to review the branch and vote
>>> for it.
>>>
>>> See: /branches/1.6.x-issue3719
>>
>> It currently has 2 of the 3 required votes (see
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS). I
>> have previously looked at the branch (and built it), but didn't have
>> time to review it in detail yet. I'll try to take another look tonight
>> so this can be backported ...
>
> Ok, the 3rd vote is in, so the fix is all set for being backported.
> When 1.6.17 gets made, it should hop along ...

The bugfix has been merged to the 1.6.x branch, so that's the one to
be testing now:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x/

-Hyrum

Reply via email to