Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 13:55:51 +0100: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin > <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote: > > Attila Nagy <b...@fsn.hu> writes: > > > >> On 11/16/11 18:40, Philip Martin wrote: > >>> Attila Nagy<b...@fsn.hu> writes: > >>> > >>>> I use pysvn for this and basically the code looks like this (in python): > >>>> def update_perms(): > >>>> for path in propchg: > >>>> proplist = svn.propget('file:permissions', path) > >>>> if not os.path.islink(path) and proplist.has_key(path): > >>>> set_perms(path, proplist[path]) > >>>> svn.update(walkroot) > >>>> update_perms() > >>>> > >>>> The svn update collects the changed entries (propchg) and update_perms > >>>> iterates on them and gets their file:permissions property and sets it > >>>> in the file system. > >>>> > >>>> And this is what takes ages (literally), compared to 1.6. > >>>> Any ideas about what could be done in this topic? > >>> > >>> It might be faster to run a recursive propget, which is a single > >>> transaction, and discard the output if it doesn't match one of the > >>> changed paths. > >>> > >> I will try this. Should this be true even for 10+ million files? > > > > It depends on the ratio of changed files to total files. If there is > > only one changed file then the single propget will be faster. If most > > of the files are changed then the recursive propget will be faster. > > Yes, you'll need to test that a bit. > > I do something similar here with a script that fetches all the log > entries for merged revisions (cherrypick merges, which I look up with > 'svn mergeinfo --show-revs merged'): if the number of merged revisions > is low relative to their range, I perform a series of individual 'svn > log' requests. Otherwise, I do a single 'svn log -r<min>:<max>' > request, parse the output and discard the entries that are not > relevant. This made my script much faster in most cases. > > This has nothing to do with recursive propget (or even with 1.7, I'm > using this in a 1.5 environment), but I'm just noting the similarity > of the problem here.
svn log -r N -r M -r P was implemented a few years ago... > -- > Johan