Justin Johnson wrote on Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:11:18 -0600:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@elego.de> wrote:
> 
> > Justin Johnson wrote on Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:25:38 -0600:
> > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@elego.de>
> > wrote:
> > > > - Are the failing revisions always small (eg: just a URL-URL copy),
> > > >  or always large (eg: results of a merge)?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > As mentioned before, so far it appears to be 1) create a tag by copying
> > an
> > > entire working copy of a branch to a URL, and 2) commit merge results for
> > > an entire branch.
> > >
> >
> > That's not clear enough.  Could you show 'log -qv' of those revisions?
> >
> > A wc-to-URL copy could touch just one or two files (compare
> > `svn log -qv --stop-on-copy
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/tags/1.7.3`)
> > or a full tree (http://subversion.apache.org/faq.html#in-place-import).
> > Which is it?
> >
> >
> The commits fail, so there is no revision to run this against.  Other tags
> that have succeeded seem to just have one added path that is a copy of the
> branch at revision x.  Does that answer your question?
> 

Yes, thanks.

> 
> > >
> > > > - Could you try setting the maximum cache size to zero?  (svnserve:
> > > >  --memory-cache-size=0; mod_dav_svn: SVNInMemoryCacheSize 0)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Apache is our server, so this is not applicable.
> >
> > SVNInMemoryCacheSize is applicable.
> >
> 
> Sorry, I missed that one.  We have not specified SVNInMemoryCacheSize, so
> we're using the default.

... so please try SVNInMemoryCacheSize 0, and see if that makes the
issue less frequent.

Reply via email to