Justin Johnson wrote on Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 07:45:08 -0600: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Justin Johnson > <justinandto...@gmail.com>wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@elego.de> wrote: > >> ... so please try SVNInMemoryCacheSize 0, and see if that makes the > >> issue less frequent. > >> > > > > I'm a dork. I will do so once I take care of the appropriate change > > control I have to deal with. Thanks. > > > > We made the change and problem is still occurring.
OK. So that means that either membuffer isn't the cause of the error, or both membuffer and inprocess have (independent) bugs. That said, I'm happy to see that it took you less than a day to report that the bug no longer reproduces. Can you reproduce it at will? --- I'm not completely sure what to try next. Were there any other significant changes in 1.6.x->1.7.x besides caching? If so, the next steps would be to disable _both_ inprocess and membuffer, or to bisect. Unfortunately, the latter requires building svn from source, and the former requires either that, or having you upgrade to specially-built binaries, or squeezing the "disable inprocess" feature into 1.7.4 (in a way that doesn't break our compat policy too badly) and having you upgrade to that. devs/all --- thoughts? Is there a simpler way forward than the two potential 'next step's I've outlined here?