Guten Tag Charles Gallo, am Dienstag, 23. April 2013 um 14:22 schrieben Sie:
> Blame/annotate does exactly what I want, but the client (mumble > mumble) wants the info in the actual source code file as comments! I > explained that all the info is in blame/SVN, but they actually said > "the auditors won't see the repository, just the source, and they > want to be able to see what changed and by whom". That's why I'm not > allowed to delete code, only comment out. Sigh Maybe you should try a different approach: Why do the auditors don't have or want access to the repo? May read-only copy of the repo to access offline a solution? If the auditors just need the info about who changed what as inline comments in the source, because they aren't allowed to access the repo or else devil himself will kill the world ;-), how about a process generating what they need as an on demand process? They need access to the code somehow in any way, maybe you could create the view your client wants as a part of some export or preparation process using the source code repo you seem to have access to? You could even build some nice little GUI especially for the auditors if your client pays well and in time. ;-) Focusing on specially formatted commits or stuff like that may not be the only solution. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail:[email protected] AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow
