On 23.04.2013 16:29, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > Guten Tag Charles Gallo, > am Dienstag, 23. April 2013 um 14:22 schrieben Sie: > >> Blame/annotate does exactly what I want, but the client (mumble >> mumble) wants the info in the actual source code file as comments! I >> explained that all the info is in blame/SVN, but they actually said >> "the auditors won't see the repository, just the source, and they >> want to be able to see what changed and by whom". That's why I'm not >> allowed to delete code, only comment out. Sigh > Maybe you should try a different approach: Why do the auditors don't > have or want access to the repo? May read-only copy of the repo to > access offline a solution?
You clearly have never had to deal with the more Neanderthal species of auditor who believe meaningful technological advance stopped about 200 years before Gutenberg. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
