On 19.05.2013 11:46, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > Guten Tag Andreas Krey, > am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 um 22:55 schrieben Sie: > >> All that structure is implicit. Unless someone tells you, you >> have no ways to deduce which paths of a subversion repository >> are meaningful to check out and which aren't. > But that's nearly the same with any other SCMs which support branches > and tags as "1st class sobjects". You have always to options to decide > what is a branch or tag, something special in the data model or simply > some kind of convention. The data model is a better way for knowing > automatically if something is a branch or tag, no doubt, but one > should consider the main purpose of SCMs during software development > and devs use conventions everywhere in their work. It's a known > concept with some valuable benefits, e.g. flexibility. > > Besides that, knowing what a branch or tag is is only one aspect, this > tells you nothing about it's purpose and therefore to know if it is > meaningful to anybody, useful to checkout or something else. Purposes > of branches and tags need always to be communicated between humans.
I do agree, however, that being able to list the tag and branch names associated with a particular versioned object would be nice. The trouble is that it's not exactly obvious what that really means in the context of Subversion's object model. In other words, hand-waving is not a good feature specification. :) -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com