On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Trent W. Buck <trentb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm stuck. Since it's no fun to have tens of thousands of empty revs > in each project repo, my current approach is to leave existing > projects in the monolithic repo, and new projects get separate repos. >
Why do you think an empty rev will bother anyone any more in a per-project rev that having the rev number jump from a commit to an unrelated project does in the combined repo? It shouldn't be a problem in either case. Rev numbers for any particular use don't need to be sequential, you just need to know what they are. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com