On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Trent W. Buck <trentb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt <subversion-20...@ryandesign.com> writes:
>
>> As someone used to Subversion's usually sequential revision numbers,
>> that bugs me aesthetically, but it works fine.
>
> I think that's the crux of it.
Have you checked if the users have/need anything (emails, ticket
system, etc.) that refer to specific revisions or the history of
changes made there? It seems kind of drastic to throw that away
because you think the numbers aren't pretty enough.
>Also part of the reason to split up the
> repos is to make access control easier, and it looks bad if Alice (who
> should have access to project 1 but not project 2) can see Bob's old
> commit metadata to project 2, even if she can't see the commit bodies
> after the split.
How does this work now in the combined repository?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
