On 11.12.2013 20:19, Bob Archer wrote: >> On 11.12.2013 17:21, Mark Kneisler wrote: >>> I think making the pristine files optional would work for me. >>> >>> >>> >>> Here’s an idea. >>> >>> >>> >>> Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to >>> the pristine directory only when a file is changed? >>> >> You know, that's a great idea! I wonder why we never thought of it >> ourselves? :) > Wouldn't that mean that you need to have some daemon service (or file watcher > or something) running to determine if a file is modified?
Yes. > Also, it would mean you would need a constant connection to the server to use > a subversion working copy. Not necessarily; we don't need a pristine copy to check if a file is modified, or if 's out of date WRT the repository. But the former problem (requiring a daemon) is already a non-starter. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com
