On 18.05.2017 13:27, Andrey wrote: >>> As you see the file1.txt is missed in second status output as >>> unversioned and so can be missed from add before a commit. >> It's not unversioned, it's in the "deleted" state. You can't have both, >> since you can revert the deletion. > If i'll revert it then i'll LOSE CHANGES because the svn will remove > another file w/o warning in this case. Just because it had the same name. > > However, I don't want to revert anything, i am talking about > possibility of forget to add files because they are obscured by the > deletion state in the status.
So what do you suggest we do instead? There's a file named 'foo' that was deleted with 'svn rm' but not committed, and also a file named 'foo' that you created on disk before committing the deletion (or rename). What do you propose 'svn status' should show? -- Brane
