ons 23 juli 2025 kl. 10:08 skrev Andreas Stieger <andreas.stie...@gmx.de>:
> Hello John, > On 2025-07-23 02:16, Branko Čibej wrote: > > The first sentence of the first paragraph on that page says, with emphasis: > > The Apache Subversion project *does not officially endorse or maintain* any > binary packages of the Subversion software. > > > Please don't assume endorsement just because the project publishes those > links. They're a service to the community, no more and no less. > > You don't say what you actually need (other than that it "run extremely > well", which is not very specific). It might be best if you try them all > and see which one best fits your requirements. > > > In addition to what Brane wrote: All else being equal and merely basing > this on your stated requirements > > > SVN.EXE client for Windows operating systems (e.g. Windows 2022). > > > and the fact you work for its.ny.gov, I would say that.. > > > TortoiseSVN (optionally installs 32- and 64-bit (x64 and ARM64) command > line tools and svnserve; supported and maintained by the TortoiseSVN > project) > > > this will one that is rather likely be hassle free to deploy and run in > your environment. > > Andreas > Cirata, VisualSVN and SlikSVN on the other hand are commercial entities and it might be possible to negotiate support contracts with them, something that may be important for a service to run ”extremely well”. TortoiseSVN is very much volunteer driven. I doubt there are much differences between the projects with regards to stability, except they might contain different versions of the dependencies. For example TortoiseSVN currently bundle a version of OpenSSL which seems to crash on ARM under some circumstances. Cheers, Daniel
