I have tested your Login component (in the case
extending BaseComponent and then extending
AbstractBaseComponent) and there is no problem with
the validator.
Shing
--- Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried to make my class extend BaseComponent
> and nothing happened.
>
> This is the source for the base class I use for all
> my components. Its
> pretty straightforward and since all components are
> DB aware, I handle all
> the db logistics in here. But still, I cannot see
> how this could fail to
> affect my validators.
>
> public abstract class AbstractBaseComponent extends
> BaseComponent implements
> Serializable {
>
> protected DataSource ds;
> protected Connection conn;
> protected PreparedStatement stmt;
> protected ResultSet rs;
>
>
>
>
@InjectObject("service:Configuration.ConnectionPool")
> public abstract DataSource getDataSource();
>
>
> public ResultSet executeQuery(String query){
>
> try{
> ds = getDataSource();
> conn = ds.getConnection();
>
> stmt = conn.prepareStatement(query);
>
> rs = stmt.executeQuery();
>
> }catch(Exception e){
> println(e.getMessage());
> }
> return rs;
> }
>
> protected void print(Object msg){
> System.err.print(msg.toString());
> }
>
> protected void println(Object msg){
> System.err.println(msg.toString());
> }
> }
>
> On 7/24/06, Shing Hing Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > To narrow down your problem, you could make the
> java
> > class of your component extends BaseComponent
> directly
> > (if possible) and
> > see whether the validator works.
> > Also, it might be a good idea to post the code of
> your
> >
> > AbstractBaseComponent (if it is reasonably short).
> >
> > Shing
> >
> > --- Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I didn't override any methods, although calling
> > > super could be usefull.
> > >
> > > On 7/24/06, Shing Hing Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I do not know whether the following helps.
> > > > In your custom class AbstractBaseComponent,
> if
> > > you
> > > > have over ridden any methods of its parent
> > > > BaseComponent, please check if you need to do
> a
> > > > super().(overRidden method).
> > > >
> > > > Shing
> > > >
> > > > --- Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > My component extends AbstractBaseComponent.
> Its
> > > a
> > > > > class I created to work as
> > > > > a parent for all my components. That way I
> can
> > > use
> > > > > inheritance to customize
> > > > > my components at will.
> > > > >
> > > > > AbstractBaseComponent itself extends
> > > BaseComponent.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/24/06, Shing Hing Man
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oops ! What I said about the missing
> delegate
> > > is
> > > > > > rubbish. The validator should work without
> it.
> > > (I
> > > > > have
> > > > > > tested it.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There should not be any difference
> whether a
> > > > > > component
> > > > > > is defined explicitly (in jwc or .page)
> or
> > > > > implicitly
> > > > > > (in .html).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The java class of your component extends
> > > > > > AbstractComponent.
> > > > > > I thought if your component has a html
> > > tmeplate,
> > > > > you
> > > > > > need to extend from BaseComponent.
> > > > > > (But then James has said it works for
> him.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Shing
> > > > > > --- Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am looking at another project where I
> > > defined
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > form inline in the HTML
> > > > > > > and it worked without it. I just defined
> a
> > > form
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > <form jwcid="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
> > > > > > > and had no problems.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Whats the difference between declaring
> the
> > > form
> > > > > > > properties inline and in the
> > > > > > > component specification, why does it
> work in
> > > one
> > > > > > > instance and not on the
> > > > > > > other?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I know I could put the form
> specification in
> > > the
> > > > > > > html template, but I want
> > > > > > > to keep all my specifications in the
> > > component
> > > > > > > specification. Its just the
> > > > > > > philosophy we chose for our project.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/24/06, Shing Hing Man
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think you have left out the delegate
> > > > > attribute
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > the Form component.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/ComponentReference/Form.html
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Shing
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- Rui Pacheco
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Here they go:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This is my .jwc:
> > > > > > > > > <?xml version="1.0"
> encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > > > > > > > > <!DOCTYPE component-specification
> PUBLIC
> > > > > > > "-//Apache
> > > > > > > > > Software
> > > > > > > > > Foundation//Tapestry Specification
> > > 4.0//EN"
> > > > > "
>
=== message truncated ===
Home page :
http://uk.geocities.com/matmsh/index.html
___________________________________________________________
Copy addresses and emails from any email account to Yahoo! Mail - quick, easy
and free. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/trueswitch2.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
