Martin -

Can you please change your email address? I rediscover it about once a
month, usually as I'm about to take a gulp of hot coffee or tea. Reading
programming-related mailing lists should not be dangerous to your health ;-)

Regards,

Daniel


On 12/21/06, Martin Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I'm still troubled by the fact that nobody has come up with an answer to
this:
Is vi better than emacs or is it the other way around?

Martin

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:53:44 +0100, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Jesse,
>
> This comment of yours that Wicket, in its current form, is technically
> inferior doesn't hold water for me. Can you cite concrete reasons why
you
> think so?
> And when I read your comment that they get beaten up a lot I decided to
> go
> goggle and find out what that means and could see that the only bashing
> on
> Wicket was based on their abuse of the session but this I read in the
> link
> to the article I posted earlier that they are solving this issue by
using
> the hard disk.
> Sorry, but I like fair discussions.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On 12/20/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Why would Tapestry be losing any kind of battle because one person
>> wrote an email saying they "recommend" using Wicket?
>>
>> When Wicket is actually technically / some other version of better
>> that I can measure I'll admit it but I'm obviously biased towards
>> Tapestry so my opinions are highly suspect.
>>
>> Good for them for getting some good press. They get beaten up a lot so
>> I think it's good that some positive articles are floating around out
>> there for them.
>>
>> On 12/20/06, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi Guys,
>> >
>> > I came across this article
>> > http://www.infoq.com/news/2006/12/wicket-vs-springmvc-and-jsf and
>> thought
>> > probably someone here could comment. Is Tapestry really losing the
>> battle
>> > against Wicket?
>> >
>> > Emmanuel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to