Well, I know it's not T4 => T5, I was just adding a possible source of bad perception due to this misconception (and to misnaming...?)
I think that the fact of not having a stable T4 "ajax ready" release add confusion to this. A customer thinking that T4 => T5 might think "well they are not pushing that much on T4 with ajax because they are already working on T5, so as I want to work with Ajax why should I work with T4 that will be soon outdated and not retrocompatible with T5?". And so on... And actually having On 3/29/07, Andrea Chiumenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martino, your comment is because you consider T4=>T5 as the major part of people does. On 3/29/07, Martino Piccinato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think another bad perception might origin from the fact of having the T4 > "Ajax ready" 4.1 release still not released as stable after quite a long > time and a completely new not retrocompatible T5 appear (the same to me: > not > critiques, just observations). >