On 12/6/07, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think this habit of yours of breaking things you think should be done > differently is bad indeed. It is this habit that had endured sufferings > and > almost an impossible task for anyone trying to migrate from any pre T5 to > T5.
Tapestry 5 doesn't have a final, stable release, so everybody working with it cannot take for granted that everything will always be the same. ;) I heard there is a secret work on T6 that would be almost incompatible > with all previous versions. Please post the source of the statement above. In http://jroller.com/WarnerOnstine/entry/why_hasn_t_tapestry_been, Howard wrote: *(...) the design of Tapestry 5 was created specifically to make it possible to continue adding features without breaking backwards compatibility going forward. There will not need to be a Tapestry 6. * Unless Howard has changed his mind, I don't have any reason to believe that Howard is already planning a Tapestry 6 without full backward compatibility with T5. Thiago
