Would you give up already, you are not a tapestry user, tapestry 5 is very well documented, has a great mailing list, has exhaustive unit tests...
If I don't like some framework, I don't use it and that's it. Please have some respect to tapestry users and go away already. Davor Hrg On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Rob Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I'm not disputing the fact that Tapestry is a good framework but all > what I'm saying is the fact that at every major release there must be a > whole rewrite from scratch with little or no regard to backward > compatibility seems to me not a tool for prime time, or serious stuffs > besides a Hello world applications. I consider Tapestry a tool for > experimentation at the labs or schools where students are knowledge hungry > to learn new things. If your business is based on a model that looks into > the future then I'm afraid you'll be sorry to go with Tapestry. Because > every year when you want to benefit from the evolution in Webframework > technology, you'll have to start all over again- in otherwords throw away > your earlier investment. Tapestry is good but there are far more better > and > excellent frameworks out there with genius people behind it that at each > major release they face the challenge of backward compatibility head on > and > make everyone happy. They don't choose the easy route of starting all over > again. That one even first year computer science students can do. > > Your's friendly, > > Rob > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Jonathan Barker < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Rob, > > > > You may have a point or two. > > > > That what you describe as one of the best Internet applications has beta > > status suggests that some beta code is as good as / better that other > > production code. I would have to agree. I've had production apps > running > > on Tapestry alpha code for some time. > > > > The length of time that Gmail has been in beta is, however, a cop-out. > To > > me, it's Google's way of saying, "Don't blame us." Come on Google, > stand > > behind your application! I suspect that will change as they market more > > heavily to small business. > > > > It would have been more useful had you picked another application > > framework > > to compare to Tapestry for stability and time in beta. Perhaps next > time. > > > > That you personally don't do anything with Tapestry beyond a Hello World > > application... oh, never mind, that's too easy a target. > > > > FYI, .02 cent = $0.0002 > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Rob Smeets [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 8:06 AM > > > To: Tapestry users > > > Subject: Re: T5: beta? > > > > > > Guys, stop the exagerations. Gmail, one of the best Internet > application > > > ever written still has a beta status. Unlike Tapestry, Gmail has had > > the > > > beta status for years and would therefore trust it more than Tapestry > > > which > > > I personally won't do anything serious with it beyond a little bit > more > > > advanced Hello world application. > > > > > > My .02 cent. > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Blower, Andy > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > The fact that you're using T5 in the real world at this beta stage > is > > > very > > > > good news for the upcoming release IMO, even if it delays the RC a > > bit. > > > (not > > > > too much though I hope ;-) > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: 09 April 2008 19:32 > > > > > To: Tapestry users > > > > > Subject: Re: T5: beta? > > > > > > > > > > We're still not making a big deal; the transition from alpha to > beta > > > > > affects us more than the rest of the world. I think we'll > probably > > > > > start seeing a new branch for 5.0 work and a switch-over of trunk > to > > > > > 5.1 pretty soon. > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime, I'm using 5.0.12 for a client project and finding > a > > > > > fair amount of rough edges and minor bugs. I'd just as soon take > > care > > > > > of those in parallel with the client project since the end result > is > > a > > > > > far more useable and finished 5.0 final. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
