For what its worth:

+1:   org.apache.tapestry5

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Sven Homburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> my vote for "org.apache.tapestry5"
>
> 2008/5/19 Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > A few people have noticed some significant changes in Tapestry
> > 5.0.12-SNAPSHOT.
> >
> > What's going on is a limited number of interface and package renames
> > to support deploying Tapestry 3 or 4 and Tapestry 5 in the same web
> > application (WAR).
> >
> > Most of the conflicts were related Tapestry annotations in T4 vs. T5.
> >
> > The org.apache.tapestry.annotations package was renamed to
> > org.apache.tapestry.annotation (for T5) so as not to conflict with the
> > same named package, and overalapping annotation class names, from T4.
> >
> > I'm still experimenting, but this "dual headed" deployment will be the
> > best upgrade path from T3/T4 to T5.
> >
> > I expect to follow up with new T5 tools to make sharing data between
> > the apps easier.
> >
> > Sorry for the disruption this late in the game.
> >
> > The question is: would it have been better to just broadly rename
> > org.apache.tapestry to org.apache.tapestry5?  There was quite a bit of
> > discussion back on forth among the developers on this one.
> >
> > --
> > Howard M. Lewis Ship
> >
> > Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> with regards
> Sven Homburg
> http://tapestry5-components.googlecode.com
>

Reply via email to