Hi Francois, I agree with your suggestions.
I would like to be able to configure Javascript to be included in the head section rather than at the bottom of the page. We recently had a discussion about it here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2364. Without it you need hacks to execute Javascript before the page is rendered, which is really a common thing to do, especially if you setup your page to also work without Javascript. regards, Onno On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Francois Armand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Ok, so we reach the point where T5.0 final is imminent, and we are all (I > think) really happy of that. > As we also want that T5 really makes its way in the Java Web ecosystem, I > think it always miss some really little things that are really important for > a .0 release. > > I purpose to start this discussion in the ml, and when some major gap > emerge, to post them in the issue tracker, and vote for them. > > So, for me, what I expect for 5.0 : > 1/ - full and complete and rather simple internationalization : I really > believe that a web framework can ignore other language and culture (date, > number) today ; > that include validator translation and stuff like that. > 2/ - valid XHTML, even for IE, by default. The workaround is here for some > time, but why it's not default ? See > http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5HowToXhtml > 3/ - something around AJAX documentation and Zone update inside a form > (that includes update of part of a form on change from a select : > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-138) > 4/- a property symbol provider, also simple and in use almost always @see > http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5HowToReadSymbolsFromPropertiesFile > > Without 1, T5 just can't get is path easely outside English contries ; > Without 2, T5 can hardly be considered top-level (even if on the technical > point of vue, it's completly rigth and it's IE fault), without 3, AJAX seems > not so well integrated, and it's hot stuff todays, and 4 is so much common > in a application, why do we have to bother with that each time ? > > Other simple stuff that should be corrected before 5.0 (in my opinion) : > - why hidden field is still missing ? It's so easy to add, a new user > should not even have to search for that ! > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-257, that seems to bring > other pb with decorator and the like ; > > What do you thing about that ? Does it make sense to open a "community want > that" bug, that have to be quick to handle, but that brings the attention of > T5 developers on what we need ? Perhaps we can already vote for existing > bugs ? Which ones ? > > -- > Francois Armand > Etudes & Développements J2EE > Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com > Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28 > ----------- > InterLDAP - http://interldap.org FederID - http://www.federid.org/ > Open Source identities management and federation > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
