To me this is a worthwhile exercise for two reasons:

1. Abstraction from prototype (or any 3rd party library for that matter) is a 
good thing, it will make Tapestry more modular and agile going forward
2. Using native JavaScript for core Tapestry is sensible even if its more work. 

Libraries will gain in popularity and fizzle out, whats important is 
extensibility, and thats what these guys want to achieve.

Peter


----- Original Message -----
From: "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" <[email protected]>
To: "Tapestry users" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, 15 June, 2009 20:09:52 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest, 
Istanbul
Subject: Re: Switch from Prototype to jQuery?

Em Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:06:14 -0300, Piero Sartini <[email protected]>  
escreveu:

> Maybe we  would see way more components for tapestry if they could be  
> build with jquery.

They can be built with jQuery. I even made one that I plan to opensource  
later. I don't know why other people haven't done components that build on  
jQuery.

-- 
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to