Thanks Bryan.
 I thought, that if I specify t:id attribute, than I must have according
object in my java class with the same name. For example: t:id="myBean"
andprivate MyType myBean;but as I see it is not necessary.
Anton

2010/12/12 Bryan Lewis <jbryanle...@gmail.com>

> I use a RadioGroup with a Loop frequently.  I think you only need to change
> the way you specify the label.
> Here's an example from my code:
>
> <t:radiogroup value="item.territory">
>  <t:loop source="model.territories" value="territory">
>    <t:radio t:id="territory" value="territory" label="prop:territory.name
> "/>
>    <t:label for="territory" class="radiolabel"/>
>  </t:loop>
> </t:radiogroup>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Anton Mezerny <anton.meze...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I'm trying to render dynamic RadioGroup like here:
> >
> > > <t:radiogroup t:id="radioGroup"
> > >
> >                      value="value"
> > >                       label="prop:context.availableLabel"
> > >                       encoder="valueEncoderForFeature"
> > >                       validate="prop:selectValidator">
> > >
> > <t:loop source="context.availableItemList" value="oneItem">
> > >                       <t:radio label="literal:oneItem.name"
> > value="oneItem"
> > > />
> > >     </t:loop>
> > >
> > </t:radiogroup>
> > >
> > Now labels are not rendered at all. Component renders only radiobuttons
> > without any text lables.
> > I can't add <t:tabel> tag because I have no defined Radio component in my
> > component class (it could be several radiobuttons inside one RadioGroup).
> > I tried also use plain html, like
> > <label
> > for="${currentFeature.id}-feature-label">${currentFeature.name}</label>
> > <input id="${currentFeature.id}-feature-label" t:type="radio"
> > label="literal:currentFeature.name" value="currentFeature" />
> > but tapestry rewrites input id, so label is rendered but not work as a
> > label
> > (click on it does'nt work)
> >
> > How can I achieve a normal label behavior in my case?
> > Thanks in advance.
> > Anton
> >
>

Reply via email to