Hi Is it possible using your library to implement security assertions based on business rules? For instance, only allow object owner or admins to edit this object?
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 14:38, Taha Hafeez <tawus.tapes...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I have made a number of changes in the project to support @Requires* > annotations. There is support for voting and adding new voters and > providers. Adding custom annotation is also very easy. There is also > support > for regular-expression based page-authorization if you don't like > annotations or like to keep security in AppModule only > > It is an example of how easy tapestry5 is. Even implementing a full > authorization module is so easy!!! > > The link is > http://code.google.com/p/tapestryauth > > <http://code.google.com/p/tapestryauth> regards > Taha > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Taha Hafeez <tawus.tapes...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Hi Werner > > > > > > I think it can be... It can act as a tapestry-layer over any > > security/authentication framework... > > > > Will try to add an example for such a use but overall I want this as a > > standalone role-based access and permission-based access model for > > tapestry which is apt for small projects and can be extended to larger > > projects too.. > > > > But any suggestions will be more than helpful and especially corrections > > and criticism,,, > > > > regards > > Taha > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is this related or may be used with SSO technologies like OpenID, SAML > or > >> OAuth? > >> > >> Werner > >> > > > > > -- Dmitry Gusev AnjLab Team http://anjlab.com
