No, it can't. Role model is not enough here. I don't want _any_ manger to
update _any_ foo instance.
I want that *only manager created the foo instance* could update it. Can I
do that with your lib?
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 16:04, Taha Hafeez <tawus.tapes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can't that be achieved by securing service/dao methods
> @RequiresLogin
> public interface FooDAO {
>
> @RequiresRole("ADMIN")
> public void add(Foo foo);
>
> @RequiresRole("MANAGER")
> public void update(Foo foo);
> }
>
> regards
> Taha
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Dmitry Gusev <dmitry.gu...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Is it possible using your library to implement security assertions based
> on
> > business rules?
> > For instance, only allow object owner or admins to edit this object?
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 14:38, Taha Hafeez <tawus.tapes...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I have made a number of changes in the project to support @Requires*
> > > annotations. There is support for voting and adding new voters and
> > > providers. Adding custom annotation is also very easy. There is also
> > > support
> > > for regular-expression based page-authorization if you don't like
> > > annotations or like to keep security in AppModule only
> > >
> > > It is an example of how easy tapestry5 is. Even implementing a full
> > > authorization module is so easy!!!
> > >
> > > The link is
> > > http://code.google.com/p/tapestryauth
> > >
> > > <http://code.google.com/p/tapestryauth> regards
> > > Taha
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Taha Hafeez <
> tawus.tapes...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Werner
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think it can be... It can act as a tapestry-layer over any
> > > > security/authentication framework...
> > > >
> > > > Will try to add an example for such a use but overall I want this as
> a
> > > > standalone role-based access and permission-based access model for
> > > > tapestry which is apt for small projects and can be extended to
> larger
> > > > projects too..
> > > >
> > > > But any suggestions will be more than helpful and especially
> > corrections
> > > > and criticism,,,
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > Taha
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> Is this related or may be used with SSO technologies like OpenID,
> SAML
> > > or
> > > >> OAuth?
> > > >>
> > > >> Werner
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dmitry Gusev
> >
> > AnjLab Team
> > http://anjlab.com
> >
>
--
Dmitry Gusev
AnjLab Team
http://anjlab.com
