Hi antalk, You could use Tapestry and use many different datasources..., since tapestry is a presentation framework, I think you could just drop tapestry-hibernate.
I 'm using tapestry backed up with pre-existent spring/hibernate beans and although I 'm not using it right now I think I could use many datasources if I wished. I know an application could be fully developed with tapestry using it's IoC and all it's modules and that's an advantage..., but being able to work with other widely-used frameworks like spring it's also an advantage. cheers! Nicolás.- On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:31 AM, antalk <ant...@intercommit.nl> wrote: > > True, > > But they have forgotten to ask if the original poster wants to use multiple > databases, if so i wouldn't encourage using Tapestry (sigh). > > For me this is one of the biggest letdown's , i have written 2 apps in Tap > 5.2 who both require access to multiple datasources, but the inability to > use multiple databases (through tap-hibernate) has required me to do some > hacking around to get this working. > > If i knew this beforehand i dont think i had choosen Tapestry.. > > On the other hand i think the framework is great and provides me with > enough > flexibilty to do what i want to do. > -- > View this message in context: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Noticed-another-stackoverflow-question-on-Tapestry-5-go-vote-tp3377101p3377198.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
