Tapestry is officially very, very fast: http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/comment-page-1/#comment-22319. We of course knew that already but I hope the author updates the graph.
Kalle On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Massimo Lusetti <mluse...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Kalle Korhonen > <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I really didn't want to say anything definitive about since I didn't >> run it on a dedicated, clean test bed or anything. I just run the >> benchmark for some time on my development machine, mostly comparing >> against Wicket (just because I copied Wicket's templates as a basis) >> and the throughput (of Tapestry) looked very good. There are lot of >> variables though and just .jmx doesn't tell when and how the >> measurements are taken, so the original author really needs to run it >> the same way on the same platform to make any objective comparisons. > > Too fair Kalle.... Too fair! ;-) > > Cheers > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
