... and the graph's updated: http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/. Check the concurrent users vs response time - Tapestry is beating JSP as well :) Might be worth mentioning at tapestry.apache.org. I'll update the test app to use T5.3 once an alpha version is out.
Kalle On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Kalle Korhonen <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tapestry is officially very, very fast: > http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/comment-page-1/#comment-22319. > We of course knew that already but I hope the author updates the > graph. > > Kalle > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Massimo Lusetti <mluse...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Kalle Korhonen >> <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I really didn't want to say anything definitive about since I didn't >>> run it on a dedicated, clean test bed or anything. I just run the >>> benchmark for some time on my development machine, mostly comparing >>> against Wicket (just because I copied Wicket's templates as a basis) >>> and the throughput (of Tapestry) looked very good. There are lot of >>> variables though and just .jmx doesn't tell when and how the >>> measurements are taken, so the original author really needs to run it >>> the same way on the same platform to make any objective comparisons. >> >> Too fair Kalle.... Too fair! ;-) >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Massimo >> http://meridio.blogspot.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
