On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:17:35 -0200, trsvax <trs...@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree about having a prototype.jar and I don't view this as a backward
compatibility problem. Dependencies change from version to version
anyway.
It would also make it easier to create something other than jQuery if
needed.
The original idea is to create a framework-agnostic JavaScript layer to be
used by Tapestry-provided JS code. It would be implemented in Prototype
and jQuery out-of-the-box and anyone could provide your own implementation
too. This way, there's no useless code in either option.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,
and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
