On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 00:16:57 -0300, Ken in Nashua <kcola...@live.com> wrote:
Don't be so sure. The first usable versions of Tapestry 5 were released 4 years ago. It's been quite rare to get a T4 question, so I guess most people here have never used Tapestry 5.
Ken, please, how many times do we need to say that the philosophy in Tapestry about logic in templates has changed? Regardless of Tapestry, the best practices have been of putting all logic in Java classes for at least ten years? If you really want to put logic in your templates, something we strongly say don't do that, you can use ChenilleKit's OGNL property binding or, as Muhammad Gelbana suggested, create your own binding. -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo |
Re: is there a way to refer to a Class type in a tml ?
Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:49:47 -0700
- Re: is there a way to refer to a Class type i... Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
- RE: is there a way to refer to a Class t... Ken in Nashua
- Re: is there a way to refer to a Cla... Bryan Lewis
- Re: is there a way to refer to a Cla... Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo