Hi Thiago! Thank you for answering also "general" questions ;-)
ad Q3: it was not clear if a bug listed under "bugs" is fixed or not. Therefore, it was also not clear if a bug e.g in release 2.4 is LISTED is then fixed in release 2.5. If the release page would name the bug header as "fixed bugs" - it would be much clearer. the language of programmers if often reduced and only understandable in the context (of a programmer). so for one it is clear, that under "bugs" fixed bugs are listed, and for the others, it seems that those listed bugs are still ope bugs in this release. And, as i could see, e.g at http://tapestry.apache.org/release-notes-52.html fixed bugs are also listed as fixed bugs ;-) -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-Release-Notes-How-to-read-it-tp5717713p5717725.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
