As you have discovered, Text is a Node and is not an Element. Elements are 1. Wrapped in < and > 2. Can have attributes 3. Are containers for child elements On 21 Jul 2014 13:33, "Davide Vecchi" <d...@amc.dk> wrote:
> > Either Element.raw(...) or Element.text(...) > > Both give me the problems I explained. > In a few words they don't create Element nodes but Raw and Text nodes. > > I'm not clear why I see all those Element instances containing text but I > cannot create one myself (Raw and Text are not Element-s, just Node-s like > Element itself) or why I cannot change that Element's text without , but > I'll have to assume I just cannot, period, and I can certainly live with > that. > > When I have an Element node with a child Element node, I will just turn > that into an Element node with a child Text node instead; I think it will > work just fine, I was just trying to clarify my understanding of Element. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lance Java [mailto:lance.j...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 14:14 > To: Tapestry users > Subject: RE: Customizing the grid to alter its own content > > Either Element.raw(...) or Element.text(...) On 21 Jul 2014 13:09, > "Davide Vecchi" <d...@amc.dk> wrote: > > > Thanks, that looks like a really good way to use DOM rewriting to > > alter grids. > > > > However if I'm looking at it correctly I think that in > > GridCellDecorator.decorate I would still need to be able to set an > > Element's text, which I don't know whether it's possible. >
