"Actually, I thought it would be a good joke to mix Wicket and Tapestry and 
make some die-hard-Wicket user use Tapestry to fill the IOC gap - instead of 
Spring and Guice.”

Funniest thing I’ve read in awhile.  Thanks for the laugh.

Robert

> On Apr 22, 2016, at 4:35 AM, Christian Riedel <cr.ml...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
> You would only need Tapestry IoC for the builders.
> Many moons ago I replaced Spring with Tapestry IoC in a Wicket project: 
> https://github.com/criedel/WicketTap5IOC
> I bet you can find the appropriate hooks in your project to do something 
> similar! APIs have changed since 5.2 though.
> With what framework would you integrate Tapestry?
> 
>> Am 22.04.2016 um 09:27 schrieb Adam X <vbgnm3c...@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> Why? Just curious. :)
>> 
>> Well, that brings me to my problem. What I'm really after is
>> Tapestry's ordered configuration and its chain builder service, so I
>> thought I may as well use IOC since I don't think I can split them. Or
>> let me ask my question differently. Is Tapestry registry, chain
>> builder and ordered configuration in all in the core module? And if
>> so, can I just bring in the core module to use it?
>> 
>> My use case is a set of distributed plugins and chain of
>> responsibility executing them within the engine of my project. I tried
>> apache commons chain but it lacks several features that Tapestry's
>> ordered list of chain commands.
>> 
>> So in short, after reading:
>> https://tapestry.apache.org/chainbuilder-service.html sounds like it's
>> exactly what I need. If I bring in only tapestry core jar, will I get
>> this? And if I need Tapestry IOC as well, I would happily replace my
>> CDI with IOC.
>> 
>> Adam
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Cezary Biernacki <cezary...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> I have used Tapestry-IOC in many non-gui tools including REST applications
>>> based on Dropwizard, and it is very easy to do. Just in some place during
>>> process initialisation build a IOC registry, retrieve some starting service
>>> and call that service - later all dependencies can be handled by
>>> Tapestry-IOC. I am not aware of any tutorials outside Tapestry website, so
>>> ask if you need any more specific help.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Cezary
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
>>> thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:18:30 -0300, Adam X <vbgnm3c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi!
>>>> 
>>>> I have a rest project (no gui) with CDI backed by Weld. I would like to
>>>>> switch to Tapestry IOC instead.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Why? Just curious. :) I haven't used CDI so I cannot compare it to
>>>> Tapestry-IoC.
>>>> 
>>>> Are there any good tutorials that cover this?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> It's mostly the same. Just the way you start the Registry is different.
>>>> If http://tapestry.apache.org/starting-the-ioc-registry.html isn't
>>>> enough, please let us know.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
>>>> Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
>>>> http://machina.com.br
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> 

Reply via email to