On Sep 18, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Shanti Suresh wrote: > All, > > I wanted your opinion on this topic. I was heavily into using "mod_jk" a > few years back. But I have since started using mod_proxy for the following > reasons: > (1) mod_proxy is easier to configure > (2) I remember reading that "mod_jk" is deprecated
I've not heard this. Where did you read this? > (3) Logging for mod_proxy appears inline with Apache traffic log entries > and is easier to debug. I am able to get detailed logging from mod_proxy > by adjusting Apache's "LogLevel to debug". > (4) Could there be any other reasons that I might be missing? I found this article helpful. http://www.tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/06/16/deciding-between-modjk-modproxyhttp-and-modproxyajp Dan > I do also like the separate logging that mod_jk gives though. I notice > that mod_jk is still being used. I just wanted to know your opinion. > > Thanks. > > -Shanti --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
