Hi Chris,

Appreciate your feedback.  That is helpful.

Thanks you!

                         -Shanti

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Shanti,
>
> On 9/18/12 10:04 AM, Shanti Suresh wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I wanted your opinion on this topic.  I was heavily into using
> > "mod_jk" a few years back.  But I have since started using
> > mod_proxy for the following reasons: (1) mod_proxy is easier to
> > configure (2) I remember reading that "mod_jk" is deprecated (3)
> > Logging for mod_proxy appears inline with Apache traffic log
> > entries and is easier to debug.  I am able to get detailed logging
> > from mod_proxy by adjusting Apache's "LogLevel to debug". (4) Could
> > there be any other reasons that I might be missing?
> >
> > I do also like the separate logging that mod_jk gives though.  I
> > notice that mod_jk is still being used.  I just wanted to know your
> > opinion.
>
> I use mod_jk because it gives me greater freedom of configuration and
> tends to get updated more often. It is definitely "harder" to
> configure, though, since a separate configuration file is usually used.
>
> As I don't use SSL between httpd and Tomcat this isn't much of an
> issue for me, but connecting httpd->Tomcat via SSL is trivial with
> mod_proxy_http (and not with mod_jk) while forwarding SSL info from
> httpd -> Tomcat (while still using an unencrypted channel) is trivial
> in mod_jk but more difficult with mod_proxy_http.
>
> - -chris
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlBYzKUACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBx0QCglrPz2MZLBeqeKp8LivAvLMqj
> CosAnirMA2WNiN03BGvO6FthJ07LfWNK
> =jDfk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to