>-----Original Message-----
>From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
>Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 8:20 AM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: Re: Context Path for a subdirectory
>>
>>Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
>>
>> If I can tag another question on the end of this thread:
>>
>> The Remote Address Filter has an option to set the denyStatus from 403 to
>404, or whatever.  In general, I'm guessing it's better to respond that a
>restricted resource is not found, rather than respond that is it there but 
>forbidden?
>>
>
>Purely personal opinion : by doing this, you "kind of" violate the spirit of 
>the HTTP
>specification, and you create some confusion at the technical level.
>And, essentially, you are lying to the client.
>So, in general, it is not "better".
>
>But hey, it's your server, so you're free to return whatever you believe is 
>most appropriate.
>Within limits though. For example, if somewhere you provide a link to that 
>section for
>some people, but when they click on it, they get a "not found", they may think 
>that your
>application isn't working, or that your documentation is incorrect.  While if 
>they get a
>"forbidden", they may realise that they need to ask for a permission.
>

Why is denyStatus an option?  Why would someone use it?

Leo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to