On 27.02.2013 09:59, André Warnier wrote: > And from Schwaben too... > I feel a bit naive after all the sophisticated technical stuff above, in > suggesting the following, but how about : > If I understand the original post correctly, the whole point would be to > know, at the httpd level, which "worker" (Tomcat) actually processed > this request, right ? > If so, why not have the desired response header added at the Tomcat level ? > The more or less standard workhorsse URLRewriteFilter could be used here > for that. > <rule> > <from>.*</from> > <set type="response-header" name="TC-worker">name of this > tomcat</set> > </rule> > and then check this on the way back in Apache.. > That would also overcome Rainer's note about load-balancing above. > As a matter of fact, I am quite sure that Tomcat itself already adds > some kind of response header to indicate that it was involved in this, > so it might just be a matter of proper Tomcat configuration.
Much better :) Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
