> -----Original Message----- > From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 9:55 AM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Baked-in context paths > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 10:07 AM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Baked-in context paths > > > > > > Jeff, > > > > On 11/7/13, 10:17 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- From: Leo Donahue - OETX > > >> [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November > 06, > > >> 2013 4:29 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: [OT] RE: Baked-in > > context > > >> paths > > >> > > >>> -----Original Message----- From: Leo Donahue - OETX > > >>> [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov] Subject: RE: Baked-in > > >>> context paths > > >>> [...snip...] > > >> I don't know why my email client keeps adding this junk. There > > isn't > > >> even a carriage return after this line. Sorry for the wasted > bits. > > > > > > You must be using Outlook. My Outlook tends to do that every time I > > > reply to one of Chris' PGP-signed messages. The trick is to make > > > sure you remove all the PGP signature and all the header bits > > > associated with it. > > > > :( > > > > I didn't know that was happening. I used to use PGP/MIME but > evidently > > that made my messages invisible (i.e. no-content) for some people > with > > ... less capable email readers. So I switched to in-message > signatures > > which seemed to be a bit more compatible. > > > > Apologies for the inconvenience. > > > > - -chris > > No real problem Chris. I normally delete everything at the end of a > message that's not relevant to the message. It's just that I sometimes > forget to remove the "BEGIN PGP MESSAGE" and hash line at the top of > the message, and so for some reason Outlook still puts in a bunch of > junk at the end. > Not really your fault. If only MS would support industry standards > better, we'd all be better off. (I also can't set it to not top-post > replies.) B > KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB > [ X ܚX KK[XZ[ > > \ \ ][ X ܚX P X ] > \X K ܙ B ܈Y][ۘ[ [X[ K[XZ[ > > \ \ Z[ X ] > \X K ܙ B
Ack! Ack! Spfft! Spfft! Ack! F-in Microsoft!
