I get it and agree, but it does just add unnecessary complexity also. 

Have a Happy!!!

Dream * Excel * Explore * Inspire
Jon McAlexander
Senior Infrastructure Engineer
Asst. Vice President
He/His

Middleware Product Engineering
Enterprise CIO | EAS | Middleware | Infrastructure Solutions

8080 Cobblestone Rd | Urbandale, IA 50322
MAC: F4469-010
Tel 515-988-2508 | Cell 515-988-2508

jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not 
use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any 
information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise 
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for 
your cooperation.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 4:54 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>;
> jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID
> Subject: Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy
> 
> Jon,
> 
> On 12/6/22 16:22, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
> > What, pray tell, is an encrypted AJP connection? Are you talking AJP
> > over an SSH Tunnel (Stunnel)?
> Exactly. It's absolutely cheating, but it achieves the goal :)
> 
> -chris
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 3:01 PM
> >> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy
> >>
> >> Jon,
> >>
> >> On 12/6/22 12:36, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
> >>> IMHO, switching to mod_proxy, and using it over SSL, is by far
> >>> better than
> >> using mod_jk or mod_ajp, primarily as mod_proxy allows for secure
> >> proxy connection, whereas mod_jk and mod_ajp aren't "secure" as they
> >> are not encrypted channels.
> >>
> >> While this is true (and supports my assertion that everyone should
> >> migrate), it doesn't preclude the use of encrypted AJP connections.
> >>
> >> -chris
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to