I am not saying this is 100% correct, or the best documentation ever but I wrote a small install guide for Apache 2.2 and Tomcat 5.5 with mod_jk. I used the same steps on a RH7.3 box and a Slackware 10.2 box.
http://www.crankhouse.com/howto.php?f=modjk On 11/16/06, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > All I can say is that I googled around extensively, trying to learn > how to set up Tomcat 5.5 with Apache 2.2 as the front end, and found > many sites saying to stay away from mod_jk, along with mailing list > messages about the problems people were having with it. I have no idea why so many people have problems with mod_jk. I have never had a single problem with it. It's stupid simple to install: 1. Download and untar (gnu tar!) 2. $cd native 3. ./configure --with-apxs=/path/to/apxs 4. make 5. make install (as root) It works for me every time. Setup is slightly more complex, because you need to have a "workers" file (but you can avoid that in recent versions of mod_jk) which trips some folks up. > It goes > without saying, that when you have to depend on mailing list messages > for documentation of any problem, you have a high likelihood of > getting it wrong. This list is highly active, and with Rainer Jung on the list (who knows more than anyone really should about mod_jk ;) ), you should always be able to get good advise. > Especially when you are under the gun and trying to > complete a project and not wanting to spend all this time figuring out > how to do what ought to be quite straightforward. Agreed. At this point, since it's been a few days, you have probably tried something already. What did you try and how did it go? > The Apache Software Foundation produces some of the best and most > useful software in the world. They simultaneously produce some of the > worst user documentation for that software. I completely agree. Many software developers are simply terrible writers. It's not their fault, it's just the truth. Most folks who get into OSS are coders because, well, software is the name of the game. There aren't too many professors of literature on these projects ;) > If you want to achieve a > shortlived feeling of amazement, go to http://www.apache.org and > search for the expression mod_jk. You'll get four hits for > mod_proxy. Now search for "mod_jk" (with quotation marks). You'll > get two mailing list messages from the httpd mailing list. I can but > shake my head. Aah. I think the problem is that you were searching www.apache.org, instead of the Tomcat-related pages. Yes, mod_jk is an Apache httpd module, but it's a non-standard module (that is, it isn't bundled with the source or binary distributions). It should be considered a 3rd-party module. Essentially all information about mod_jk is available through the Tomcat website, not www.apache.org. Sorry about that. :( > Well, good luck. I wanted to set up Apache 2.2 with Tomcat 5.5, to > proxy user directories (/home/user/public_html) with Apache to serve > static content and Tomcat to serve JSP/servlets. Nothing. > Zip. Nada. I know I'm not the only person that ever wanted to do > this. But I could not find documentation anywhere. Hell, I'd buy the > book if there was one available. I had the same experience. One of the engineers on my team decided to install all the latest versions of everything on his dev environment instead of matching production. That meant using Apache httpd 2.2 instead 2.0, and he pointed out that somewhere, there was the wild-ass claim that mod_proxy_ajp was the way to connect to Tomcat in 2.2. Well, we looked for documentation on how to connect them and it just doesn't exist. Just a lot of people saying "yeah, yeah... use mod_proxy_ajp". mod_proxy_ajp has (or at least had) no documentation whatsoever and so you have to read all about mod_proxy. No problem. You read all about mod_proxy and it's all about proxying HTTP, not ajp13. So, on a hunch, I simply changed the example do something like this: Proxy /someURI ajp13://localhost/someOtherURI and it worked. Lucky guess without any indication from the mod_proxy documentation that this was even possible. After getting that simple thing set up, we tried some of our more exotic configuration settings. For instance, we have /most/ of our webapp's URIs going to one worker (Tomcat running our app), but some of them need to go to another worker (Cocoon running in a separate Tomcat instance). It appears that mod_proxy only supports blindly proxying everything in a particular URL space, so we were out of luck. Not to be beaten by mod_proxy, we came up with a solution that involved re-writing the URIs using mod_rewrite so that the URL was outside of the URI space of the webapp, and then proxying it appropriately. Something like this (forgive the completely incorrect syntax): RewriteRule /myApp/something/special -> /outside/something/special Proxy /myApp ajp13://localhost:8185/myApp Proxy /outside ajp13://localhost:8285/myApp Since we had like a dozen special URIs like this, we had re-writes all over the place. When we looked at the final configuration, we both nearly vomited and just went back to using mod_jk, which does patch matching. I hope this gives you some more insight into why I prefer mod_jk and why I think doesn't deserve the bogeyman reputation it has. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFXHVy9CaO5/Lv0PARAgSLAJ9eYM4vZjMrQXTY5HX7hDMmUHY9swCgrAgh N6+ycSaSQYeg7bhNbee0cQQ= =c+ce -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
