Hello Christopher, When I check my access logs I could imagine Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) beeing a google.bot. Of course I don't know it for sure, cause I'm don't do any seo cloaking here, and don't care. But one could go to seo boards, pick the posted ip-adresses for cloaked google-bot and check one's logfiles.
my access stats: http://moskito.anotheria.net/moskitodemo/mui/mskShowProducer?pProducerId=UserAgentFilter regards Leon On 12/1/06, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Leon, Leon Rosenberg wrote: > you believe everything you've been told ?:-) Well, I've been told by you, and I don't believe you. ;) > google has 3 (at least 3 known) user agents : google, mozzila with > google-bot in the agent string (the one you sent) and another one, > which is just Mozilla/5.0. > > google uses this 3rd agent to check your site from another ip adress, > whether you do some ugly seo stuff, like cloacking etc. > > If it detects that you deliver different content to his > mozilla-disguised bot, your chances to be thrown out of the index are > pretty high. This sounds pretty plausible. Unfortunately, my empirical data suggests otherwise. Allow me to post a portion of webalizers "top user agents" list for a small site I maintain for the month of November: # Hits User Agent 1 26529 48.64% Googlebot/2.1 2 12077 22.14% MSIE 6.0 3 5285 9.69% Yahoo! Slurp 4 3353 6.15% Mozilla/5.0 There are 11 more user agents which are all pretty much irrelevant. As you can see, "googlebot" appears with a plurality of the hits (yeah, it's not a really popular site). That's a /lot/ of hits compared to the others. In fact, if you agree that "MSIE 6.0" is not google-in-disguise, then it is not possible for the remaining user agent stats to sum to a value even close to what googlebot says. Webalizer can be configured to "collapse" different user agent strings into one single user agent (say, anything containing MSIE into a single MSIE in order to get an aggregate MSIE usage number). No such aggregation is being used, here, so what you see is what you get. If your assertion was correct, I would have expected to see a large number (perhaps 1/3 or 1/2 of the googlebot hits) to come from "Mozilla" as google-incognito, but that's not the case. Can you give a reference to where you discovered this "fact"? - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFcEZ/9CaO5/Lv0PARAuvqAJ41d+SbmskQIDH1xW5obI2f2xQWTwCfavcf ed8ZaktgYzFpjfk2lli4vns= =HZmV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
