Thanks Filip.

-----Original Message-----
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 6:39 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Comet and Async Servlets - Architecture Question

Praveen Balaji wrote:
> Thanks Sebastiaan. I came to about the same conclusions
> as you listed out here. I also saw your post on parsing POST
parameters and I think
> it's going to create problems for me as well!
>
>
>  
>
>
> I am unsure the API would be "improved". I
> simply think, as Filip pointed out earlier, what we want to use is
Async
> servlets and Comet is not intended to solve the same problem.
>   
this is work in progress, and probably, you'd be able to do it using the

same API.
check in on the dev list

Filip
>
>
> Let's see what I can come up with!
>
> Praveen
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2007 11:19:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Comet and Async Servlets - Architecture Question
>
> Praveen Balaji wrote:
>   
>> The
>> last few days I have been evaluating using CometProcessor to work
like an
>> Async Servlet for me. I pick up the CometEvent object on BEGIN event
and
>> process the whole request asynchronously. When I am done, I close the
I/O stream.
>>  
>>
>> I
>> would like to know what the Tomcat developers and the developers in
general
>> think about this approach. Is it a misuse of the API to process
requests
>> asynchronously, outside of the event method? Are there any issues
that I should be cautious about? Synchronization issues?
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
> See the mailing list archive of the last month and filter on "comet". 
> There have been quite a few posts on exactly this subject.
>
> There are multiple issues:
>
> 1) Closing the I/O stream (on the response) does not end the 
> request/response. It takes another 30-60 seconds before the event
method 
> gets called with an END event leaving a lot of request open
unnecessarily.
>
> 2) Nothing is synchronized in Comet, so you have to do all 
> synchronization yourself. You have to make sure that you do not write
to 
> the output stream after the event is closed (even though you may still

> have the reference in your asynchronous application code). I seem to 
> have eliminated most issues by synchronizing access to the response 
> output stream and using the same lock around the event.close() method
in 
> the event() method of the CometProcessor. However I still very 
> sporadically get a ClientAbortException/ClosedChannelException which 
> suggests that I've missed a place where synchronization is necessary.
It 
> might not be possible to synchronize this though, because it could 
> happen deep inside Tomcat. The API has no information about what to 
> synchronize for asynchronous use.
>
> 3) If you rely on the POST method to send parameters to your 
> CometProcessor, then you have to parse the parameters yourself; there
is 
> an issue that doing getParameter() on the request in the BEGIN event
may 
> return null because the request body has not yet been received by the 
> server at the moment of the getParameter() call.
>
> One of the Comet developers (Remy) suggests that it might be better to

> just use normal servlets and buy some extra memory for the extra
threads.
>
> As far as the current API goes, I would say it is probably a "misuse",

> though I would very much like to see the API improved so that this is
no 
> longer the case.
>
> Regards,
> Sebastiaan
>
>   
>> Thanks,
>> Praveen Balaji.
>>   
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>> http://mail.yahoo.com 
>>   
>>     
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
>   
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/785 - Release Date:
5/2/2007 2:16 PM
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to