Hi Johnny, As far as i know, tomcat/webdav is just a simple webdav implementation that allow access to local file system. Slide webdav is file server that provide a webdav interface. It does not store the submitted file as plain file on server, but on stores (typically a database) that includes documents binding, access control, revisions, metadatas. It also provides a quite undocumented api to access documents from within your java code and a webdav client API.
Johnny Kewl a écrit : > David, just wondering.... I see you Jakarta, Slide is probably your > project... > I had a quick look, looks like a webdav, come file server. > Tomcat is Jakarta right?.... so I'm just wondering why you guys dont > talk about a common webdav module.... ie a tomact user adds a few more > modules and gets slide, and webdav seems to be very much your thing, > ie you up on the specs, so I'm thinking, why have two development > efforts? ... just wondering.... > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Delbecq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 1:06 PM > Subject: Re: WebDav - mapping question? > > >> That's strange that MS doesn't handle it. As i said, i have a slide >> webdav servlet mapped to <webapp>/DAV/* and MS webfolder can access it >> throught all our company without much troubles, even without a trailing >> slash. (there are slight troubles that are unrelated) >> Mark Thomas a écrit : >>> David Delbecq wrote: >>> >>>> Tomcat should not refuse webapp/webdav if you have a mapping to >>>> /webdav/*. It should at least dispatch to servlet mapped on /webdav/*. >>>> >>> >>> Tomcat doesn't reject requests of this type . For any directory >>> resource without a trailing '/' it will do a 302 redirect and add '/'. >>> The MS client doesn't seem to be able to handle the redirect. This is >>> probably the cause of the problem. I tried raising this with MS and >>> got nowhere. >>> >>> Because of where Tomcat does this redirect, I can't immediately see a >>> way around this. I'll have a think over the next few days. >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]