-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve,
Steve Ochani wrote: | On 10 Jun 2008 at 17:20, Christopher Schultz wrote: |> What leads you to that conclusion [that Fedora Core is inappropriate for production use]? | | 1. When Fedora project was started I remember reading that it was almost like a testbed for | testing new apps/open source projects to be put into Red Hat Enterprise Linux. It should be the same as RH's enterprise Linux, except that it doesn't have all the Enterprise-y tools and stuff. | 2. 6 month support cycle isn't exactly something that is long lasting/reliable for production | systems. (IMO 3 years is a min.) Fair enough. I never bother with support, anyway, for a Linux system. They run very well, and we keep up-to-date. If you update your packages (still uring RPM, right?) regularly, the 6-month window slides with you, doesn't it? | 3. The past history of "stable"ness of some versions, such as version 7. Heh. I have no direct experience. I dumped Red Hat after RHL went from 6-9 in like 2 years. I was sick and tired of their package manager. Then I discovered Gentoo, which I prefer, and Debian, which is supported by our co-lo provider, though I don't like apt very much. At least it installs dependencies for you ;) I haven't looked back. | If someone is looking for a Red Hat type linux distro that is stable, long support time/cycle | then they should consider CentOS. Noted. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhP2EcACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDAvQCfYRZmzI0YfPWGpleYct7MkAiS FVIAnRTgk+At+dyC1tYC8bLdQq8Gmsnz =hbRM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
