-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Liraz,
On 4/20/2009 4:25 PM, Liraz Siri wrote: > Christopher Schultz wrote: >> I would argue that "A" is best achieved by a hardware load balancer >> rather than Apache httpd, "B" is actually /not/ achieved by the addition >> of Apache httpd (more components means more complexity which means >> higher maintenance costs), and "C" is served perfectly by Tomcat alone. >> >> If I were you, I would provide a Tomcat-only "appliance" and a separate >> "load-balancer" appliance that could be trivially combined to achieve >> all your goals. > > Quite right. We forwarded some of the feedback we received on the list > to some of the people consulted with and it seems there was a > misunderstanding on our part. It doesn't make sense for the load > balancer and Tomcat to be in the same appliance. We'll be fixing that in > the next version. Sounds good! Don't get me wrong: I hadn't intended to merely complain. I'm just applying some of the best practices I've learned through the years both working on my own projects and helping out folks on this list. I think a Tomcat appliance is a great idea. Remember to use APR for SSL! :) - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkns5PsACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDEGQCfZtjPc28OsS9Tt+dIAty2RCI+ vWIAn17EENMpkbQdI6XF7+dWhPL6XbpR =uuRA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
