Nope. I turned off Apache before I launched JBoss after it was configured to run port 80. That way only one process was running with port 80. Tomcat external to JBoss worked for my environment.
Anyway, I went with a architecture where Tomcat was outside of Jboss which is where I was headed a couple of years ago. Back then I could not get jndi to work between JBoss and Tomcat but I did two nights ago. Now I can update Tomcat and stay ahead of JBoss releases since it was usually behind Tomcat upgrades which is expected due dependencies. I got very close to my goal with what hardware/configuration I could last night. Thanks for replying, -Tony --- On Tue, 10/13/09, pieroxy <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: pieroxy <pier...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Does Tomcat http work on port 80? > To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org> > Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 9:54 AM > If I got it correctly, you are trying > to setup your JBoss on port 80 when > you already have an apache running on port 80... Is that > correct? > If so, you need to understand that only one process may > listen to a given > port number. This is your issue. > > If not, please clarify... > > Regards > > 2009/10/9 Tony Anecito <adanec...@yahoo.com> > > > First off my question was answered (in the subject > line) that what I am > > doing should work for Windows OS. > > > > When I did a view source in Firefox there was > nothing. > > > > When I looked at the error dialog box in FireFox there > was nothing. > > > > When I looked at the server logs for Jboss (both boot > and log written to > > after booting) there was no mention of an error. > > > > By default there is no access log for Tomcat I have to > enable it according > > to an email sent by Chuck. > > > > I have not looked for any additional browser plugins > yet since for me > > FireFox has been great at showing errors. But I will > look at the other > > option you mentioned. > > > > I have installed both JBoss 5.1.0GA and Tomcat 6.0.20 > on another OS Windows > > XP and changing to port 80 worked fine. > > > > The initial responses on this forum were Linux related > but later ones after > > reading that I was stating Windows 2000 Prof made > adjusments to their answer > > to my question. > > > > From the responses sounds as if no one has seen this > type of problem which > > is probably related to some other install or OS > specific or combination of > > all the above. > > > > Regards, > > -Tony > > > > Regards, > > -Tony > > > > --- On Fri, 10/9/09, André Warnier <a...@ice-sa.com> > wrote: > > > > > From: André Warnier <a...@ice-sa.com> > > > Subject: Re: Does Tomcat http work on port 80? > > > To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org> > > > Date: Friday, October 9, 2009, 11:00 AM > > > Tony Anecito wrote: > > > ... > > > When I changed the server.xml recommended > > > by Jboss and others to port 80 I got the > white page (no > > > source) > > > > > > Tony, > > > you may get a page that looks empty in your > browser. > > > But that is not all that you are getting. > > > If you look at the page source, you will probably > see > > > more. > > > If you look at the server logs, you will see much > more. > > > If you get some add-on to your browser (like > HttpFox or > > > Fiddler2), you will see even more, in the form of > HTTP > > > headers and a status code that the server > returns. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > -- pieroxy > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
