On 25/11/2009 12:13, geoff...@fileflow.com wrote:

On 25 Nov 2009, at 12:53, Pid wrote:

On 25/11/2009 11:30, geoff...@fileflow.com wrote:
On 25 Nov 2009, at 11:10, Pid wrote:

On 25/11/2009 08:17, geoff...@fileflow.com
<mailto:geoff...@fileflow.com>  wrote:
I changed the size to 4K, 50K and 1 byte without any luck.

What about adding a byte counter to catch when the exception occurs?

It happens totally at random. Sometimes after 200KB sometimes after 250MB

Were you able to compare that amount to the size of the file being sent?
E.g. is it at occuring at unpredictable percentage of file sent.

It is totally random. Even on the same file. Sometimes just 1% and other time 
almost 95%. I tried with files between 5MB and 285MB. I cannot see any patterns.

Is there anything in your application that could cause another thread to access the response object or it's output stream?

Given that we don't see problems like this with any frequency, I'd have to lean towards there being something in your application code that is causing this.


p




On 25 Nov 2009, at 00:28, Pid wrote:

On 24/11/2009 20:03, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2009/11/24<geoff...@fileflow.com<mailto:geoff...@fileflow.com>>:
There is a different amount of data sent each time before it
crashes. I also tried byte by byte and gets the same error but it
seems that it is less often.


So it is random... I wonder what can trigger it.

What connectors are you using? Is it HTTP, or AJP? What is your
configuration as a whole?

There was the following bugreport recently:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48105

The reporter of issue 48105 wrote that he saw exceptions in 6.0.18,
.20 as well, but no stack traces were provided, so it is unconfirmed.

I don't think we got to the bottom of why that was happening. I was
hoping the problem would be in the same method, but it's not in
exactly the same location for both.

The append(byte[], int, int) method is implicated in both, and in
both cases an 8k byte buffer was in use in the app code.

@Geoffrey - can you try using a smaller (say 4k) byte buffer
instead, and adding some code to count how many bytes have been sent
when the error occurs?


p


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
<mailto:users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
<mailto:users-h...@tomcat.apache.org>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
<mailto:users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
<mailto:users-h...@tomcat.apache.org>





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
<mailto:users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
<mailto:users-h...@tomcat.apache.org>





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to